The confusion comes from peoples' need to belong to / be accepted into a
Define your sexual preferences = Set limits to your sexual preferences (proof)
I am...
A. Gay
B. Bisexual
C. Straight
People are born as A or B or C. A great many start at C due to expectations/pressure/mores/values from groups in their immediate surrounding. As they grow up, they start to ask questions about their sexuality probably because they feel as if something is amiss.
Depending the amount of fear (EMOTION) they harbor inside them, they tend to, starting from C:
1. Remain in C.
2. Dabble in B.
3. Jump to A.
Sometimes people do 1.
Sometimes people use 2 as a stepping-stone / transition-period towards A.
Sometimes people people become comfortable doing 2, without feeling the need to do 3.
Sometimes people go straight to 3.
Some people in A/C do 2, because of mere curiosity.
1st chart shows the barbaric and utterly inefficient way of defining sexuality, by creating specific labels depending on personal preferences. Notice I placed unnamed tabs so you can label them at your convenience. The 2nd chart is created to show how much of a genius I am. Should you decide to pick 1st chart to find out your sexual preference, you wind up limiting yourself according to the definition of that label. There is no room for compromise. Should you decide to pick 2nd to define your sexual preferences, the amount of people you can possibly have sex with is limitless! Bwa hahahaha!
============================
I went to a Star Trek convention about a decade ago. So much fun. The next time I go I wanna dress up as the Borg Queen and I'll bring a couple hundred of my minions friends along and have them dress up as drones. Then we'll spread out and do a flashmob style dance routine to Alejandro by Lady Gaga. Just thinking about it makes my ass pucker with excitement.
============================
It takes an intelligent person to learn something complex, but it takes a genius to be able to teach it to stupid people.
It takes an intelligent person to learn something complex, but it takes a genius to be able to teach it to stupid people.
============================
I think the face has a lot to do with it. INTJs usually have either a scowl or an expressionless face. When INTJs are using the expressionless face, people can't read it. If you look at a happy face, you think "happy person." When you look at an expressionless face, you think "what the fuck is going on in there?" as if they can't pin down the INTJ based on looking at its face. The human brain and its tendency to fill in the blanks will take over. The observer will start to imagine all sorts of things that are going on in the INTJs head. Maybe it's not 'attraction' per se, it's curiosity; humans are curious about us.
I think the face has a lot to do with it. INTJs usually have either a scowl or an expressionless face. When INTJs are using the expressionless face, people can't read it. If you look at a happy face, you think "happy person." When you look at an expressionless face, you think "what the fuck is going on in there?" as if they can't pin down the INTJ based on looking at its face. The human brain and its tendency to fill in the blanks will take over. The observer will start to imagine all sorts of things that are going on in the INTJs head. Maybe it's not 'attraction' per se, it's curiosity; humans are curious about us.
============================
No comments:
Post a Comment